We work very hard to make sure that ads shown on Google provide useful information for our users. But sometimes we need to take action against ads that violate our policies, as when we block malware ads, or when we filed suit last year against “Google Money” scammers. This is especially true when it comes to advertising for products such as pharmaceuticals, which can be dangerous without the right prescription.
Like many online services, we have struggled with this problem for years. It’s been an ongoing, escalating cat-and-mouse game—as we and others build new safeguards and guidelines, rogue online pharmacies always try new tactics to get around those protections and illegally sell drugs on the web. In recent years, we have noticed a marked increase in the number of rogue pharmacies, as well an increasing sophistication in their methods. This has meant that despite our best efforts—from extensive verification procedures, to automated keyword blocking, to changing our ads policies—a small percentage of pharma ads from these rogue companies is still appearing on Google.
So this morning we filed a civil lawsuit in federal court against advertisers we believe have deliberately broken our rules. Litigation of this kind should act as a serious deterrent to anyone thinking about circumventing our policies to advertise illegally on Google. As we identify additional bad actors, we will add them to the lawsuit. Rogue pharmacies are bad for our users, for legitimate online pharmacies and for the entire e-commerce industry—so we are going to keep investing time and money to stop these kinds of harmful practices.
Bukan MLM, Replika web, Money game, tidak menemui siapapun. segera dapatkan Rahasia ini
DAPAT GAJI RP.1JUTA SATU HARI
Tidak perlu keahlian khusus, bisa dijalankan siapapun walau orang gaptek
PASSIF INCOME RP. 40 JUTA
SISTEM MESIN UANG UANG OTOMATIS, SANGAT POPULER DIJAMIN TIDAK AKAN KECEWA APALAGI RUGI
About Me
Blog Archive
- September (13)
- August (33)
- July (26)
- June (36)
- May (53)
- April (42)
- March (45)
- February (37)
- January (33)
- December (52)
- November (32)
- October (38)
- September (37)
- August (31)
- July (38)
- June (45)
- May (46)
- April (37)
- March (44)
- February (29)
- January (25)
- December (51)
- November (47)
- October (55)
- September (27)
- August (23)
- July (26)
- June (34)
- May (38)
- April (34)
- March (34)
- February (25)
- January (29)
- December (25)
- November (31)
- October (43)
- September (54)
- August (23)
- July (27)
- June (24)
- May (30)
- April (27)
- March (21)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Category
accessibility
(10)
acquisition
(14)
ads
(72)
Africa
(11)
Android
(26)
apps
(144)
April 1
(1)
Asia
(14)
books + book search
(19)
chrome + chrome os
(38)
commerce
(3)
crisis response
(21)
developers
(52)
display advertising
(4)
diversity
(15)
doodles
(31)
education and research
(83)
enterprise
(47)
entrepreneurs at Google
(8)
Europe
(10)
faster web
(14)
free expression
(26)
Google Apps highlights
(36)
Google at 10
(14)
google.org
(38)
google+
(1)
googlers and culture
(58)
green
(59)
health
(15)
innovation
(14)
Latin America
(6)
maps and earth
(105)
measurement
(9)
mobile
(70)
online safety
(10)
open source
(11)
personalization
(34)
photos
(15)
policy and issues
(48)
politics
(44)
privacy
(37)
recipe
(1)
recruiting and hiring
(7)
scholarships
(17)
search
(258)
search quality
(23)
search stories
(7)
search trends
(43)
security
(24)
small business
(17)
social
(21)
This Week in Search
(58)
user experience and usability
(21)
yourgooglestories
(5)
youtube and video
(96)
youtube highlights
(17)
No comments:
Post a Comment